Center for White Rose Studies

Opening the door to the world of heroes...

Donate to our work - Memberships

Believe with us that the work of remembering not only those who survived the concentration camps, but also those who said the loudest NO possible to an evil regime, is worth doing. Believe with us, and work with us.

Support our work with time, money, or assets we need to keep going. Donate now, or contact us for more information.

Help us grow!

Click here to donate now. We appreciate your support.

Donate to our work - Projects

Center for White Rose Studies focuses on more than simply White Rose resistance. We are committed to the same level of research into other German -- and non-German -- resistance movements as we have committed to White Rose.

Click here to support the work of bringing these projects to life!

What is a hero?

"Not all heroes are good, and not all good people are heroes; not all villains are bad, and not all bad people are villains." - Denise Heap, 1999.

2003 is ending and it is about time that we thank you for sending us White Rose History, Volume 1. Your newsletter of December 18, 2002 jammed us up a bit initially [uns blockiert]. We were not quite sure how your harsh opinions about some people would fit into the W.R. story.

But then we received your book. We were full of admiration for your thorough research. I translated it, dictionary in hand. Since I sometimes had problems with American expressions, I lent it to the Furtwänglers, hoping that since they are half English, they could improve my translation. But the exchange did not help much.

In the end, I just read it myself. I believe you succeed in making it comprehensible to young Americans what was happening back then, what the leaflets of the "White Rose" said at the time, and what they wanted to achieve.

We are especially grateful for sending us the copy of Dr. Deisinger's report about Alexander. We only knew excerpts from [this document]. We did not know that Inge Scholl had had that in her archives for a long time.

(December 2003.)

Dr. Erich Schmorell

1. Positive - I am impressed. By the sheer number of facts that I found in your two books, with so many new to me, by the way in which all those facts are so clearly presented (your chronological method is extremely effective), by your excruciatingly detailed source references. And by the way in which this mountain of facts is transformed in much more - in the real story of real people, acting very courageously and very humanly.

2. Negative - Very little. A few occasions where I find that some non-standard english word distracts attention more than it helps comprehension ('stateside' - with no ocean in between and no United States of Germany on the home front), and a difference of opinion about the way in which Gestapo Protokols must be rendered (more about that in a later mail).

3. Improveable - It would be unfit to begin a full 'nitpicking' list here - the overall first impression is definitely one of positive awe, and therefore extremely briefly rendered hereabove, let's not now spend 10 times more ink on details that could be improved in the next edition. ...

Thanks for the good read, for all the work that went into it, for your kindness to your readers with questions, and see/read you soon. (August 29, 2005).

Philippe Willocx, Belgium

I enjoyed reading the book, but the whole thing is very disturbing to me. It makes me aware of my responsbilility. 

It disturbs me about myself. How would I have responded to the whole Nazi movement? Would I have been brave enough? Would I have been wise enough?

The book hits me between the eyes. Would I have the courage of my convictions to stand up and say, "It ends here"? When did they realize you have to finally make the decision to do something about it?

When do I realize that I have to take a stand - put in perspective: World War II German people and Hitler? To know your effort is important and essential? How much creeps up on us unaware? Questions your own moral integrity.

I have a strong sense of duty. How much would the Nazi Party have used this to their own end? After reading the book, I am afraid I would not have been one who stood up. (April 2006)

Ashley Horner, Phoenixville, Pennsylvania

Recommendation from AATG, 2004

Many an American German teacher, whether at the high school or college level, has used as a teaching tool Michael Verhoeven's film Die Weiβe Rose and Inge Scholl's book on her siblings Hans and Sophie, members of the Munich resistance group against Hitler. Ruth Sachs's goal is to debunk the myths and legends that film and book have propagated. Only 10% of the Scholl Archives are open to the public because Inge Aicher-Scholl remained the strict guardian of Hans's and Sophie's diaries and letters until her death in 1998. Manuel Aicher then sold the archives to the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in Munich, with the restriction that he determine what was to be made public and who would be allowed to use the materials. Inge Scholl refused to grant Sachs an interview in 1995, and had Franz Josef Müller, the director of Munich's White Rose Foundation, deny her access to its library and archives.

Sachs's research however did not come to a halt, since she used Gestapo files and other primary source materials from the Bundesarchiv in Berlin. In addition to consulting an impressive number of scholarly works listed in the annotated bibliography, she interviewed many eyewitnesses to
complete the heavily footnoted academic version of the story.

Among them were Traute Lafrenz, Susanne Hirzel (a close friend of Sophie's), Kurt Huber's son Wolfgang, and Erich and Hertha Schmorell. Her efforts are contained in a three-ring binder consisting of 30 chapters, each about 10 pages long. The chapters are divided chronologically in approximately three-month periods, which chronicle the activities of the characters, what their beliefs were at any given time and, most importantly, what happened historically during the period from 1933 to 1942.

Sachs's declared goal for her book, which can also be purchased in a less-heavily-footnoted version for the classroom, is to tell the White Rose story "in historical context, comprehensively, for American youth." Whereas Inge Scholl created the image of the resistance circle centering on the noble warriors Hans and Sophie fighting for a just cause, Sachs confronts us with all the people who impacted the White Rose, numbering around thirty, in all their complexities.

She is a gifted narrator who makes history come alive for students and teachers alike; against an impersonal account, Sachs brings herself into the story with comments, assessments, and some conjectures necessitated by the blocked materials. But she backs up all claims with research and does not shy away from asking hard questions. Sachs noted for example the deafening silence in diaries and letters about the pogrom night in 1938, even though the Scholls lived in a house filled with German Jews. In the spring of 1939 they even moved to an apartment formerly owned by a Jewish family that had had to emigrate. While puzzled by this lack of reaction to such a horrendous event, for her this underscores the hard fact that most Germans moved on with their lives acting as if nothing had happened.

Ruth Sachs's findings are truly groundbreaking, filling in some of the pieces in the previously incomplete puzzle. In the interrogation files for Bündische Trials from 1937-38 it comes out that while in a leadership position in the Hitler Youth, Hans Scholl repeatedly sexually molested a boy under his tutelage. For the history teacher this information is valuable for examining how the Nazis dealt with homosexuality and the bündische youth groups. We also learn that later on Hans - as were many in those times - was likely addicted to a drug known today as crystal speed, which could account for some of the reckless behavior this charismatic, but deeply troubled young man displayed around 1941. We follow Sophie's development from an enthusiastic Jungmädel leader to a critical observer of the political climate, and catch a glimpse into the psyche of very bright, but emotionally disturbed person, who after reading Augustine's Confessions, even contemplated suicide.

In her attempt to add the "missing voices" to the chorus, Ruth Sachs gives vivid accounts of Willi Graf's alienation that he must have felt among his indoctrinated fellow-soldiers at the Eastern front, Otl Aicher's developing conscience, and the willingness to act of the brothers Falk and Arvid Harnack, as well as their influence on Lilo Ramdohr. This volume ends in April 1942, before any of these young people have written and distributed the fliers for which they were to become so famous.

Summing up, it can be safely asserted that the many disconcerting revelations with which the reader of this volume is confronted are well balanced by the realization that authentic, even shocking human frailties could and did co-exist with the genuine heroism of which those dire times were so sorely in need!

Dr. Petra Fiero, Western Washington University. Published in Die Unterrichtspraxis: Teaching German. A Journal of the American Association of Teachers of German. Volume 37, number 2. © 2004.

All images on this page © Denise Heap. Heading image © Denise Heap, 2020. Please contact us for permission to use.